May
Perspectives on the AT&T Byron Nelson
I love this place!
Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .715 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .335 puts a player in the top 10 percent.
Player | History |
---|---|
Jordan Spieth | 0.653 |
Rory Sabbatini | 0.607 |
Marc Leishman | 0.533 |
Sung Kang | 0.501 |
Matt Kuchar | 0.487 |
Scott Stallings | 0.469 |
Hideki Matsuyama | 0.438 |
Scott Piercy | 0.433 |
Top of the heap
The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Justin Thomas | 3 | 1356.0 |
Scottie Scheffler | 4 | 1317.7 |
Xander Schauffele | 7 | 1239.4 |
Dustin Johnson | 8 | 1213.5 |
Will Zalatoris | 11 | 1120.7 |
Sam Burns | 15 | 1048.2 |
Joaquin Niemann | 21 | 916.3 |
Jordan Spieth | 24 | 914.7 |
Sorry, can’t make it
The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Jon Rahm | 1 | 1546.1 |
Patrick Cantlay | 2 | 1401.1 |
Rory McIlroy | 5 | 1262.1 |
Cameron Smith | 6 | 1258.1 |
Ooh, that’s hot
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Upward change |
---|---|
Will Zalatoris | 1538.1 |
Matt Kuchar | 1405.4 |
Sam Burns | 1204.4 |
Matthew NeSmith | 941.1 |
Adam Hadwin | 884.4 |
JJ Spaun | 763.7 |
Jhonattan Vegas | 604.8 |
Scottie Scheffler | 593.8 |
Brr, that’s cold
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Downward change |
---|---|
Charley Hoffman | -455.0 |
Tom Hoge | -438.0 |
Christiaan Bezuidenhout | -432.6 |
Matthew Wolff | -425.5 |
Ryan Palmer | -366.8 |
Pat Perez | -364.5 |
Sahith Theegala | -362.2 |
Carlos Ortiz | -358.3 |
Certain skills required
Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of this week’s course, TPC Craig Ranch, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.
Stat value | Statistic |
---|---|
0.18 | Greens in regulation |
0.14 | Driving distance |
0.13 | Shots gained around the green |
0.07 | Driving accuracy |
Location, location, location
Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Hayden Buckley | 68.73 |
Luke List | 68.75 |
Scottie Scheffler | 68.78 |
Taylor Moore | 68.83 |
Will Zalatoris | 68.84 |
Joseph Bramlett | 68.86 |
Jhonattan Vegas | 68.86 |
Mito Pereira | 68.87 |
Anyplace but here
Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Jonas Blixt | 70.4 |
Joshua Creel | 70.4 |
Kelly Kraft | 70.1 |
Martin Trainer | 70.1 |
Kiradech Aphibarnrat | 70.1 |
Wesley Bryan | 70.0 |
Shaun Norris | 69.9 |
Stephan Jaeger | 69.9 |
Staying close to home
Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2022 and TPC Craig Ranch, the event venue.
Player | Residence | Distance |
---|---|---|
John Huh | Dallas TX | 31 |
Kramer Hickok | Dallas TX | 31 |
Harry Higgs | Dallas TX | 31 |
Jordan Spieth | Dallas TX | 31 |
Kelly Kraft | Dallas TX | 31 |
Carlos Ortiz | Dallas TX | 31 |
Austin Smotherman | Dallas TX | 31 |
Will Zalatoris | Dallas TX | 31 |
Max McGreevy | Dallas TX | 31 |
Beau Hossler | Dallas TX | 31 |
Scottie Scheffler | Dallas TX | 31 |
Taylor Moore | Dallas TX | 31 |
Mathematically speaking
The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.
Statistic | Correlation to results |
---|---|
Top of the heap | 0.289 |
I love this place | 0.166 |
Ooh, that’s hot | 0.161 |
Location, location, location | 0.071 |