18
Jul

Perspectives on the 3M Open

Thomas Hawley 0 comment

I love this place!

Entrants ranked on history in the 3M Open event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .715 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .335 puts a player in the top 10 percent.

Player History
Tony Finau 0.299
Cameron Tringale 0.286
Brice Garnett 0.277
Charles Howell 0.275
Adam Hadwin 0.255
Adam Long 0.222
Bo Hoag 0.220
Roger Sloan 0.210

Top of the heap

The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.

Player Rank Rating
Hideki Matsuyama 25 947.8
Sungjae Im 29 933.4
Tony Finau 30 930.5
Davis Riley 36 867.9
Cameron Tringale 41 841.7
Brendan Steele 46 779.3
Adam Hadwin 47 769.1
Maverick McNealy 53 722.6

Sorry, can’t make it

The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.

Player Rank Rating
Patrick Cantlay 1 1699.0
Rory McIlroy 2 1640.1
Xander Schauffele 3 1622.1
Jon Rahm 4 1527.6

Ooh, that’s hot

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Upward change
Nick Hardy 1220.5
Brendan Steele 1175.0
Chesson Hadley 835.8
Davis Riley 833.9
Chez Reavie 815.8
JT Poston 775.5
Tony Finau 733.5
Mark Hubbard 718.2

Brr, that’s cold

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Downward change
Sungjae Im -588.0
Tom Hoge -549.5
Erik van Rooyen -543.5
Lanto Griffin -459.9
Hideki Matsuyama -427.9
Lucas Glover -373.2
Troy Merritt -366.1
Cameron Champ -333.8

Certain skills required

Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.

Stat value Statistic
0.18 Shots gained off the tee
0.18 Shots gained in approach
Driving accuracy
Driving distance

Location, location, location

Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Tony Finau 68.52
Hideki Matsuyama 68.56
Brendan Steele 68.64
Austin Smotherman 68.89
Sungjae Im 69.03
Martin Laird 69.07
Tom Hoge 69.09
Matthew NeSmith 69.12

Anyplace but here

Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Brian Gay 72.8
Jonas Blixt 71.9
Richy Werenski 71.7
Martin Trainer 71.6
Harry Higgs 71.4
Bo Hoag 71.3
Seung-yul Noh 71.2
Kevin Tway 71.1

Staying close to home

Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2022 and Blaine MN, the event location.

Player Residence Distance
Tom Hoge Fargo ND 200
Scott Gutschewski Elkhorn NE 300
Nick Hardy Northbrook IL 350
Brice Garnett Gallatin Missouri 375
Ryan Brehm Mount Pleasant MI 425
Robert Streb Shawnee KS 425
Adam Schenk Vincennes IN 525
Bo Hoag Columbus Oh 625
Jason Day Columbus Oh 625

Mathematically speaking

The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.

Statistic Correlation to results
Top of the heap 0.328
I love this place 0.167
Ooh, that’s hot 0.148
Location, location, location 0.011
Share
0 comment
Thomas HawleyCreative art