Aug
Perspectives on the FedEx St. Jude Championship
I love this place!
Entrants ranked on history in the FedEx St. Jude Championship. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .715 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .335 puts a player in the top 10 percent.
Player | History |
---|---|
Brooks Koepka | 0.664 |
Billy Horschel | 0.643 |
Daniel Berger | 0.624 |
Chez Reavie | 0.567 |
Justin Thomas | 0.515 |
Jordan Spieth | 0.472 |
Abraham Ancer | 0.470 |
Hideki Matsuyama | 0.462 |
Top of the heap
The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Patrick Cantlay | 1 | 1776.1 |
Rory McIlroy | 2 | 1650.9 |
Xander Schauffele | 3 | 1624.6 |
Jon Rahm | 4 | 1525.8 |
Cameron Smith | 5 | 1520.0 |
Scottie Scheffler | 6 | 1466.7 |
Justin Thomas | 7 | 1380.2 |
Cameron Young | 8 | 1372.6 |
Sorry, can’t make it
The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Dustin Johnson | 12 | 1240.2 |
Paul Casey | 20 | 1065.1 |
Louis Oosthuizen | 36 | 891.9 |
Bryson DeChambeau | 42 | 827.2 |
Ooh, that’s hot
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Upward change |
---|---|
Xander Schauffele | 1657.1 |
Scott Stallings | 1622.9 |
Rory McIlroy | 1592.0 |
Patrick Cantlay | 1558.8 |
Matthew Fitzpatrick | 1462.2 |
Tony Finau | 1324.6 |
Brandon Wu | 1236.7 |
Tommy Fleetwood | 1031.3 |
Brr, that’s cold
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Downward change |
---|---|
Mito Pereira | -889.6 |
Keegan Bradley | -880.7 |
Sam Burns | -754.6 |
Justin Thomas | -717.5 |
Davis Riley | -599.6 |
Collin Morikawa | -595.5 |
Justin Rose | -563.7 |
Viktor Hovland | -542.0 |
Certain skills required
Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the TPC Southwind course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.
Stat value | Statistic |
---|---|
0.19 | Shots gained in approach |
0.19 | Shots gained around the green |
0.19 | Driving distance |
0.12 | Driving accuracy |
Location, location, location
Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Scottie Scheffler | 68.61 |
Talor Gooch | 68.67 |
Rory McIlroy | 68.70 |
Matthew Fitzpatrick | 68.74 |
Russell Henley | 68.76 |
Justin Thomas | 68.81 |
Xander Schauffele | 68.82 |
Sungjae Im | 68.93 |
Anyplace but here
Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Nick Watney | 71.1 |
Brandon Wu | 71.0 |
Danny Lee | 71.0 |
Lucas Herbert | 70.9 |
Chesson Hadley | 70.9 |
Carlos Ortiz | 70.9 |
Adam Schenk | 70.8 |
Vincent Whaley | 70.8 |
Staying close to home
Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2022 and Memphis TN, the event host city.
Player | Residence | Distance |
---|---|---|
Lee Hodges | Athens AL | 175 |
Trey Mullinax | Gardendale Al | 200 |
Chad Ramey | Fulton MS | 225 |
Davis Riley | Hattiesburg MS | 275 |
Stephan Jaeger | Chattanooga TN | 275 |
Adam Schenk | Vincennes IN | 275 |
Sam Burns | Shreveport LA | 275 |
Peter Malnati | Knoxville Ten | 350 |
Scott Stallings | Knoxville Ten | 350 |
Mathematically speaking
The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.
Statistic | Correlation to results |
---|---|
Top of the heap | 0.334 |
I love this place | 0.152 |
Ooh, that’s hot | 0.137 |
Location, location, location | 0.017 |