09
Sep

A look at the Procore Championship

Thomas Hawley 0 comment

I love this place!

Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .600 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .270 puts a player in the top 10 percent.

Player History
Max Homa 0.574
Sahith Theegala 0.559
Brendon Todd 0.487
Beau Hossler 0.462
Troy Merritt 0.448
Matt Kuchar 0.438
Tom Hoge 0.401
Chez Reavie 0.392

Top of the heap

The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.

Player Rank Rating
Wyndham Clark 10 1634.6
Corey Conners 16 1477.7
Sahith Theegala 20 1357.0
Max Homa 21 1347.3
Min Woo Lee 31 1144.9
Harris English 41 1026.5
Eric Cole 45 988.9
Tom Hoge 53 917.4

Sorry, can’t make it

The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.

Player Rank Rating
Scottie Scheffler 1 3203.4
Xander Schauffele 2 2725.3
Rory McIlroy 3 2386.0
Patrick Cantlay 4 2043.8

Ooh, that’s hot

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Upward change
Patrick Fishburn 958.3
Matt Kuchar 955.8
Rico Hoey 910.7
JJ Spaun 812.5
Mac Meissner 782.2
Maverick McNealy 666.0
Eric Cole 659.0
Brendon Todd 604.0

Brr, that’s cold

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Downward change
Max Homa -1115.4
Sahith Theegala -875.4
Harris English -771.2
Adam Schenk -765.2
Lee Hodges -662.0
Nick Taylor -657.0
Lucas Glover -599.1
Taylor Montgomery -571.9

Certain skills required

Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the Silverado Resort course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.

Stat value Statistic
0.22 Scrambling
0.15 Shots gained in approach
0.07 Driving accuracy
0.06 Sand saves

Location, location, location

Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Doug Ghim 70.66
Chan Kim 70.73
Ben Silverman 70.79
Aaron Baddeley 71.04
Andrew Putnam 71.06
Greyson Sigg 71.06
Nate Lashley 71.08
Ryan Moore 71.09

Anyplace but here

Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Alejandro Tosti 73.6
Ben Taylor 73.4
Adrien Dumont de Chassart 72.9
Cameron Champ 72.9
Justin Suh 72.9
Gary Woodland 72.9
Brandt Snedeker 72.8
Ryan Brehm 72.8

Mathematically speaking

The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.

Statistic Correlation to results
Top of the heap 0.387
I love this place 0.183
Ooh, that’s hot 0.129
Location, location, location 0.011
Share
0 comment
Thomas HawleyCreative art