Mar
Perspectives on the Valero Texas Open
NEW This Month
I love this place!
Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .715 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .335 puts a player in the top 10 percent.
Player | History |
---|---|
Charley Hoffman | 0.625 |
Matt Kuchar | 0.547 |
Jimmy Walker | 0.504 |
Ryan Palmer | 0.452 |
Chris Kirk | 0.440 |
Jordan Spieth | 0.419 |
Zach Johnson | 0.367 |
Branden Grace | 0.364 |
Top of the heap
The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Rory McIlroy | 9 | 1159.7 |
Corey Conners | 19 | 926.8 |
Hideki Matsuyama | 24 | 887.0 |
Bryson DeChambeau | 25 | 876.2 |
Abraham Ancer | 28 | 848.1 |
Jordan Spieth | 34 | 818.0 |
Tony Finau | 38 | 739.3 |
Maverick McNealy | 45 | 688.7 |
Sorry, can’t make it
The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Jon Rahm | 1 | 1516.7 |
Justin Thomas | 2 | 1349.3 |
Dustin Johnson | 3 | 1251.0 |
Scottie Scheffler | 4 | 1247.1 |
Ooh, that’s hot
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Upward change |
---|---|
Chris Kirk | 1307.6 |
Gary Woodland | 1175.3 |
Corey Conners | 1172.5 |
Adam Hadwin | 1166.6 |
Kevin Streelman | 1101.7 |
Rory McIlroy | 868.4 |
CT Pan | 562.7 |
Beau Hossler | 551.7 |
Brr, that’s cold
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Downward change |
---|---|
Bryson DeChambeau | -860.4 |
Keegan Bradley | -780.0 |
Ryan Palmer | -586.4 |
Charley Hoffman | -515.1 |
Taylor Moore | -452.7 |
Jordan Spieth | -429.8 |
Tony Finau | -419.6 |
Luke List | -404.6 |
Certain skills required
Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.
Stat value | Statistic |
---|---|
0.17 | Shots gained in approach |
0.12 | Shots gained off the tee |
0.10 | Shots gained putting |
0.03 | Shots gained around the green |
Location, location, location
Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Bryson DeChambeau | 72.30 |
Min Woo Lee | 72.54 |
Rory McIlroy | 72.57 |
Corey Conners | 72.59 |
Mito Pereira | 72.70 |
Jhonattan Vegas | 72.80 |
Keegan Bradley | 72.80 |
Abraham Ancer | 72.82 |
Anyplace but here
Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Seung-yul Noh | 74.1 |
Martin Trainer | 74.1 |
Jonas Blixt | 74.0 |
David Skinns | 73.9 |
Guido Migliozzi | 73.9 |
Stephan Jaeger | 73.9 |
Justin Lower | 73.9 |
Kevin Chappell | 73.8 |
Staying close to home
Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2022 and the event venue.
Player | Residence | Distance |
---|---|---|
Abraham Ancer | San Antonio TX | 19 |
Jimmy Walker | Boerne TX | 21 |
Andrew Landry | Austin TX | 50 |
Dylan Frittelli | Austin TX | 50 |
Bronson Burgoon | The Woodlands TX | 175 |
Paul Barjon | Fort Worth TX | 175 |
Brian Stuard | Fort Worth TX | 175 |
Roger Sloan | Houston TX | 175 |
Jhonattan Vegas | Houston TX | 175 |
Mathematically speaking
The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.
Statistic | Correlation to results |
---|---|
Top of the heap | 0.190 |
Ooh, that’s hot | 0.158 |
Location, location, location | 0.141 |
I love this place | 0.102 |