Aug
Perspectives on the Wyndham Championship
I love this place!
Entrants ranked on history in the Wyndham Championship. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .715 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .335 puts a player in the top 10 percent.
Player | History |
---|---|
Webb Simpson | 0.887 |
Si Woo Kim | 0.625 |
Billy Horschel | 0.573 |
Denny McCarthy | 0.568 |
Kevin Kisner | 0.557 |
Russell Henley | 0.530 |
Sungjae Im | 0.512 |
Rory Sabbatini | 0.499 |
Top of the heap
The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Will Zalatoris | 10 | 1321.7 |
Shane Lowry | 13 | 1166.2 |
Corey Conners | 18 | 1075.0 |
Sungjae Im | 24 | 979.4 |
Tyrrell Hatton | 25 | 963.7 |
Billy Horschel | 26 | 957.1 |
Brian Harman | 27 | 942.8 |
Adam Scott | 29 | 927.0 |
Sorry, can’t make it
The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Patrick Cantlay | 1 | 1770.3 |
Rory McIlroy | 2 | 1646.6 |
Xander Schauffele | 3 | 1622.4 |
Jon Rahm | 4 | 1526.7 |
Ooh, that’s hot
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Upward change |
---|---|
Taylor Pendrith | 1398.1 |
Scott Stallings | 1383.8 |
JT Poston | 1341.8 |
Joohyung Kim | 900.1 |
Brian Harman | 801.0 |
Adam Long | 741.1 |
Mark Hubbard | 688.0 |
Callum Tarren | 601.0 |
Brr, that’s cold
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Downward change |
---|---|
Sungjae Im | -685.4 |
Davis Riley | -667.9 |
Billy Horschel | -601.2 |
Russell Henley | -521.6 |
Sepp Straka | -480.1 |
Webb Simpson | -445.6 |
Anirban Lahiri | -412.4 |
Mac Hughes | -378.8 |
Certain skills required
Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the Sedgefield CC course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.
Stat value | Statistic |
---|---|
0.17 | Shots gained off the tee |
0.14 | Shots gained in approach |
0.14 | Shots gained around the green |
0.11 | Driving accuracy |
Location, location, location
Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Sungjae Im | 67.28 |
Russell Henley | 67.44 |
Shane Lowry | 67.56 |
Martin Laird | 67.58 |
Will Zalatoris | 67.59 |
Corey Conners | 67.59 |
Billy Horschel | 67.63 |
Ryan Armour | 67.84 |
Anyplace but here
Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Richy Werenski | 70.4 |
Jonas Blixt | 70.3 |
Martin Trainer | 70.3 |
Brian Gay | 70.2 |
Brandon Hagy | 70.1 |
Nick Watney | 70.1 |
Harry Higgs | 70.0 |
Chesson Hadley | 69.9 |
Staying close to home
Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2022 and Greensboro NC, the event host city.
Player | Residence | Distance |
---|---|---|
Alex Smalley | Greensboro NC | 6 |
Ben Kohles | Cary NC | 75 |
Chesson Hadley | Raleigh NC | 75 |
Grayson Murray | Raleigh NC | 75 |
Cameron Percy | Raleigh NC | 75 |
Webb Simpson | Charlotte NC | 75 |
Mac Hughes | Charlotte NC | 75 |
Harold Varner | Charlotte NC | 75 |
Mathematically speaking
The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.
Statistic | Correlation to results |
---|---|
Top of the heap | 0.330 |
I love this place | 0.159 |
Ooh, that’s hot | 0.139 |
Location, location, location | 0.009 |