02
Jan

A look at the Sentry Tournament of Champions

Thomas Hawley 0 comment

I love this place!

Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .715 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .335 puts a player in the top 10 percent.

Player History
Justin Thomas 0.797
Jon Rahm 0.609
Xander Schauffele 0.583
Hideki Matsuyama 0.505
Patrick Cantlay 0.466
Billy Horschel 0.436
Jordan Spieth 0.433
Collin Morikawa 0.374

Top of the heap

The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.

Player Rank Rating
Patrick Cantlay 1 1925.7
Jon Rahm 3 1678.3
Xander Schauffele 4 1633.0
Scottie Scheffler 5 1544.2
Will Zalatoris 8 1413.2
Justin Thomas 9 1381.0
Tom Kim 10 1258.4
Matthew Fitzpatrick 11 1249.6

Sorry, can’t make it

The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.

Player Rank Rating
Rory McIlroy 2 1769.0
Dustin Johnson 6 1518.9
Cameron Smith 7 1489.9
Taylor Montgomery 14 1192.4

Ooh, that’s hot

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Upward change
Seamus Power 953.5
Brian Harman 856.9
Mac Hughes 675.2
Patrick Cantlay 498.1
Aaron Wise 372.5
Will Zalatoris 354.3
Sahith Theegala 298.5
JJ Spaun 297.9

Brr, that’s cold

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Downward change
Adam Scott -733.7
Corey Conners -660.9
Jordan Spieth -568.1
Sepp Straka -519.9
Hideki Matsuyama -498.1
Cameron Young -460.9
Scott Stallings -451.0
Matthew Fitzpatrick -445.3

Certain skills required

Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.

Stat value Statistic
0.35 Shots gained in approach
0.28 Putts per GIR
0.26 Driving distance
0.20 Greens in regulation

Location, location, location

Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Scottie Scheffler 70.39
Tom Kim 70.42
Will Zalatoris 70.47
Xander Schauffele 70.85
Justin Thomas 70.87
Tony Finau 71.03
Jon Rahm 71.06
Patrick Cantlay 71.08

Anyplace but here

Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Ryan Brehm 74.2
Chez Reavie 73.3
Sepp Straka 72.8
Chad Ramey 72.8
Mac Hughes 72.8
JT Poston 72.6
Brian Harman 72.5
Matthew Fitzpatrick 72.5

Mathematically speaking

The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.

Statistic Correlation to results
Top of the heap 0.357
I love this place 0.168
Ooh, that’s hot 0.151
Location, location, location 0.027
Share
0 comment
Thomas HawleyCreative art