May
A look at the Wells Fargo Championship
I love this place!
Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .715 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .335 puts a player in the top 10 percent.
Player | History |
---|---|
Rory McIlroy | 0.859 |
Brian Harman | 0.665 |
Rickie Fowler | 0.515 |
Joel Dahmen | 0.513 |
Luke List | 0.511 |
Jason Day | 0.464 |
JT Poston | 0.455 |
Keith Mitchell | 0.454 |
Top of the heap
The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Patrick Cantlay | 1 | 2276.5 |
Xander Schauffele | 4 | 1970.0 |
Rory McIlroy | 5 | 1927.0 |
Sungjae Im | 6 | 1639.5 |
Justin Thomas | 7 | 1540.6 |
Jordan Spieth | 8 | 1526.8 |
Viktor Hovland | 9 | 1526.1 |
Max Homa | 10 | 1519.2 |
Sorry, can’t make it
The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Scottie Scheffler | 2 | 2241.9 |
Jon Rahm | 3 | 2043.1 |
Cameron Smith | 14 | 1382.7 |
Will Zalatoris | 16 | 1364.1 |
Ooh, that’s hot
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Upward change |
---|---|
Cameron Davis | 1853.6 |
Taylor Moore | 1433.1 |
Jordan Spieth | 1299.3 |
Rickie Fowler | 1283.2 |
Jason Day | 1234.6 |
Patrick Rodgers | 1000.7 |
Xander Schauffele | 970.9 |
Matt Kuchar | 884.3 |
Brr, that’s cold
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Downward change |
---|---|
Max Homa | -1117.8 |
Tyrrell Hatton | -832.6 |
Seamus Power | -754.8 |
Keith Mitchell | -655.1 |
Justin Thomas | -642.2 |
Trey Mullinax | -511.4 |
Alex Noren | -481.1 |
Joel Dahmen | -431.5 |
Certain skills required
Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the Quail Hollow course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.
Stat value | Statistic |
---|---|
0.21 | Shots gained off the tee |
0.12 | Shots gained in approach |
0.10 | Shots gained around the green |
0.10 | Sand saves |
Location, location, location
Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Rory McIlroy | 69.96 |
Patrick Cantlay | 70.40 |
Tyrrell Hatton | 70.61 |
Collin Morikawa | 70.71 |
Sungjae Im | 70.72 |
Justin Thomas | 70.74 |
Tony Finau | 70.80 |
Keith Mitchell | 70.84 |
Anyplace but here
Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Nick Watney | 74.2 |
Max McGreevy | 73.8 |
Kelly Kraft | 73.6 |
Rory Sabbatini | 73.5 |
Ryan Brehm | 73.4 |
Cameron Champ | 73.1 |
Richy Werenski | 73.1 |
Doc Redman | 73.0 |
Staying close to home
Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2023 and Charlotte NC, the event host city.
Player | Residence | Distance |
---|---|---|
Mac Hughes | Charlotte NC | 10 |
Webb Simpson | Charlotte NC | 10 |
Alex Smalley | Greensboro NC | 75 |
Ben Martin | Greenville SC | 100 |
Carson Young | Greenville SC | 100 |
Ben Griffin | Chapel Hill NC | 100 |
Matthew NeSmith | Aiken SC | 125 |
Chesson Hadley | Raleigh NC | 125 |
Mathematically speaking
The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.
Statistic | Correlation to results |
---|---|
Top of the heap | 0.370 |
I love this place | 0.175 |
Ooh, that’s hot | 0.131 |
Location, location, location | 0.107 |