May
A look at the AT&T Byron Nelson
I love this place!
Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .715 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .335 puts a player in the top 10 percent.
Player | History |
---|---|
Jordan Spieth | 0.744 |
Hideki Matsuyama | 0.584 |
Matt Kuchar | 0.581 |
KH Lee | 0.517 |
Scott Stallings | 0.512 |
Ryan Palmer | 0.477 |
Seamus Power | 0.431 |
Nate Lashley | 0.375 |
Top of the heap
The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Scottie Scheffler | 2 | 2253.6 |
Tyrrell Hatton | 9 | 1503.2 |
Jordan Spieth | 11 | 1476.5 |
Jason Day | 19 | 1300.1 |
Tom Kim | 23 | 1170.5 |
Hideki Matsuyama | 30 | 1107.3 |
Adam Scott | 31 | 1097.4 |
Matt Kuchar | 32 | 1068.1 |
Sorry, can’t make it
The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Patrick Cantlay | 1 | 2272.3 |
Xander Schauffele | 3 | 2077.5 |
Jon Rahm | 4 | 2049.2 |
Rory McIlroy | 5 | 1875.3 |
Ooh, that’s hot
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Upward change |
---|---|
Scottie Scheffler | 1221.3 |
Matt Kuchar | 1071.9 |
Jimmy Walker | 906.6 |
Hideki Matsuyama | 874.5 |
Mark Hubbard | 782.4 |
Jordan Spieth | 657.6 |
Sean O’Hair | 474.5 |
Tom Kim | 468.4 |
Brr, that’s cold
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Downward change |
---|---|
Tom Hoge | -760.1 |
Taylor Montgomery | -693.4 |
Maverick McNealy | -644.2 |
Ben Griffin | -632.5 |
Aaron Wise | -559.4 |
Trey Mullinax | -460.7 |
Justin Suh | -439.1 |
Davis Riley | -391.6 |
Certain skills required
Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the TPC Craig Ranch course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course during its two-year history at Nelson host are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.
Stat value | Statistic |
---|---|
0.25 | Greens in regulation |
0.17 | Driving distance |
0.15 | Sand saves |
0.14 | Putts per GIR |
Location, location, location
Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Min Woo Lee | 66.44 |
Scottie Scheffler | 67.56 |
Taylor Montgomery | 67.86 |
Tom Hoge | 68.03 |
Will Gordon | 68.16 |
Byeong Hun An | 68.21 |
Tom Kim | 68.27 |
Seamus Power | 68.51 |
Anyplace but here
Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Scott Brown | 72.2 |
Kyle Stanley | 71.7 |
Camilo Villegas | 71.5 |
Kelly Kraft | 71.4 |
Brian Stuard | 71.3 |
Jim Herman | 71.2 |
Michael Gligic | 71.1 |
Max McGreevy | 71.0 |
Staying close to home
Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2023 and McKinney TX, the event host city.
Player | Residence | Distance |
---|---|---|
Kelly Kraft | Dallas TX | 31 |
Jordan Spieth | Dallas TX | 31 |
Zecheng Dou | Dallas TX | 31 |
Scottie Scheffler | Dallas TX | 31 |
Paul Haley | Dallas TX | 31 |
Austin Smotherman | Dallas TX | 31 |
Kramer Hickok | Dallas TX | 31 |
Max McGreevy | Dallas TX | 31 |
Harry Higgs | Dallas TX | 31 |
Si Woo Kim | Dallas TX | 31 |
Mathematically speaking
The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.
Statistic | Correlation to results |
---|---|
Top of the heap | 0.371 |
I love this place | 0.174 |
Ooh, that’s hot | 0.132 |
Location, location, location | 0.107 |