Aug
A look at the Wyndham Championship
I love this place!
Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .715 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .335 puts a player in the top 10 percent.
Player | History |
---|---|
Webb Simpson | 0.690 |
Russell Henley | 0.621 |
Sungjae Im | 0.617 |
Billy Horschel | 0.578 |
Si Woo Kim | 0.486 |
Chesson Hadley | 0.454 |
Denny McCarthy | 0.441 |
Richy Werenski | 0.414 |
Top of the heap
The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Sungjae Im | 12 | 1475.7 |
Justin Thomas | 18 | 1325.8 |
Sam Burns | 19 | 1322.7 |
Shane Lowry | 22 | 1293.9 |
Denny McCarthy | 25 | 1271.2 |
Hideki Matsuyama | 26 | 1263.3 |
Adam Scott | 30 | 1215.0 |
Russell Henley | 31 | 1205.5 |
Sorry, can’t make it
The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Scottie Scheffler | 1 | 2711.0 |
Rory McIlroy | 2 | 2470.5 |
Patrick Cantlay | 3 | 2308.8 |
Xander Schauffele | 4 | 2188.2 |
Ooh, that’s hot
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Upward change |
---|---|
Lucas Glover | 1054.3 |
Garrick Higgo | 972.0 |
Alex Noren | 948.1 |
Denny McCarthy | 858.2 |
Alex Smalley | 813.5 |
Aaron Rai | 773.7 |
Lee Hodges | 713.4 |
Shane Lowry | 705.2 |
Brr, that’s cold
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Downward change |
---|---|
Justin Thomas | -1317.8 |
Matt Kuchar | -847.3 |
Sungjae Im | -783.1 |
Taylor Montgomery | -767.5 |
Sam Burns | -679.3 |
Christiaan Bezuidenhout | -619.2 |
Adam Hadwin | -561.6 |
Billy Horschel | -544.5 |
Certain skills required
Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the Sedgefield CC course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.
Stat value | Statistic |
---|---|
0.21 | Shots gained in approach |
0.13 | Shots gained off the tee |
0.10 | Shots gained putting |
0.09 | Driving accuracy |
Location, location, location
Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Si Woo Kim | 68.26 |
Shane Lowry | 68.38 |
Gary Woodland | 68.46 |
Aaron Rai | 68.54 |
Russell Henley | 68.58 |
Adam Hadwin | 68.63 |
Sungjae Im | 68.64 |
Hideki Matsuyama | 68.68 |
Anyplace but here
Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Max McGreevy | 71.7 |
Nick Watney | 71.2 |
Harry Higgs | 71.1 |
Trevor Werbylo | 71.0 |
Ryan Brehm | 70.9 |
Tyson Alexander | 70.8 |
Dylan Frittelli | 70.8 |
Robert Streb | 70.7 |
Staying close to home
Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2023 and the Greensboro NC, event host city.
Player | Residence | Distance |
---|---|---|
Alex Smalley | Greensboro NC | 6 |
Ben Griffin | Chapel Hill NC | 47 |
Cameron Percy | Raleigh NC | 75 |
Chesson Hadley | Raleigh NC | 75 |
Webb Simpson | Charlotte NC | 75 |
Trevor Cone | Charlotte NC | 75 |
Carson Young | Greenville, SC | 150 |
Ben Martin | Greenville SC | 150 |
Mathematically speaking
The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.
Statistic | Correlation to results |
---|---|
Top of the heap | 0.370 |
I love this place | 0.173 |
Ooh, that’s hot | 0.139 |
Location, location, location | 0.056 |