11
Sep

A look at the Fortinet Championship

Thomas Hawley 0 comment

I love this place!

Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .715 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .335 puts a player in the top 10 percent.

Player History
Chez Reavie 0.525
Brian Stuard 0.474
Max Homa 0.432
Mark Hubbard 0.430
Beau Hossler 0.397
Sahith Theegala 0.392
Cameron Percy 0.377
Aaron Baddeley 0.368

Top of the heap

The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.

Player Rank Rating
Max Homa 7 1708.4
Justin Thomas 19 1332.5
Cam Davis 34 1113.3
Sahith Theegala 37 1080.2
Andrew Putnam 54 880.8
Matt Kuchar 58 846.2
Eric Cole 64 785.9
Taylor Montgomery 66 775.0

Sorry, can’t make it

The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.

Player Rank Rating
Scottie Scheffler 1 2679.3
Rory McIlroy 2 2538.2
Patrick Cantlay 3 2355.7
Xander Schauffele 4 2231.9

Ooh, that’s hot

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Upward change
Max Homa 1463.6
Cam Davis 1212.7
Garrick Higgo 885.6
Beau Hossler 701.5
Stephan Jaeger 536.4
Matthias Schmid 449.5
Jason Dufner 416.9
Davis Thompson 400.9

Brr, that’s cold

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Downward change
Justin Thomas -1031.6
Taylor Montgomery -688.4
Matt Kuchar -634.9
KH Lee -623.0
Peter Kuest -593.6
Kevin Kisner -539.9
Christiaan Bezuidenhout -534.0
Austin Eckroat -529.6

Certain skills required

Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the Silverado course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.

Stat value Statistic

Location, location, location

Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Jason Day 70.15
Brian Harman 70.15
Scottie Scheffler 70.36
Hideki Matsuyama 70.44
Byeong Hun An 70.46
Tommy Fleetwood 70.47
Denny McCarthy 70.54
Eric Cole 70.56

Anyplace but here

Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Cameron Young 71.9
Sepp Straka 71.8
Kurt Kitayama 71.7
Sahith Theegala 71.5
Corey Conners 71.5
Keegan Bradley 71.5
Tom Hoge 71.4
Collin Morikawa 71.4

Staying close to home

Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2023 and Napa CA, the event host city.

Player Residence Distance
Cameron Champ Sacramento CA 43
Martin Trainer Palo Alto CA 50
Justin Suh Los Angeles Ca 375
JJ Spaun San Dimas CA 375
Sahith Theegala Chino Hills CA 400
Scott Piercy Las Vegas NV 425
Harry Hall Las Vegas NV 425
Charley Hoffman Las Vegas NV 425
Nick Watney Las Vegas NV 425
Taylor Montgomery Las Vegas NV 425
Doug Ghim Las Vegas NV 425
David Lipsky Las Vegas NV 425

Mathematically speaking

The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.

Statistic Correlation to results
Top of the heap 0.383
I love this place 0.181
Ooh, that’s hot 0.140
Location, location, location 0.053
Share
0 comment
Thomas HawleyCreative art