Sep
A look at the Fortinet Championship
I love this place!
Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .715 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .335 puts a player in the top 10 percent.
Player | History |
---|---|
Chez Reavie | 0.525 |
Brian Stuard | 0.474 |
Max Homa | 0.432 |
Mark Hubbard | 0.430 |
Beau Hossler | 0.397 |
Sahith Theegala | 0.392 |
Cameron Percy | 0.377 |
Aaron Baddeley | 0.368 |
Top of the heap
The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Max Homa | 7 | 1708.4 |
Justin Thomas | 19 | 1332.5 |
Cam Davis | 34 | 1113.3 |
Sahith Theegala | 37 | 1080.2 |
Andrew Putnam | 54 | 880.8 |
Matt Kuchar | 58 | 846.2 |
Eric Cole | 64 | 785.9 |
Taylor Montgomery | 66 | 775.0 |
Sorry, can’t make it
The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Scottie Scheffler | 1 | 2679.3 |
Rory McIlroy | 2 | 2538.2 |
Patrick Cantlay | 3 | 2355.7 |
Xander Schauffele | 4 | 2231.9 |
Ooh, that’s hot
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Upward change |
---|---|
Max Homa | 1463.6 |
Cam Davis | 1212.7 |
Garrick Higgo | 885.6 |
Beau Hossler | 701.5 |
Stephan Jaeger | 536.4 |
Matthias Schmid | 449.5 |
Jason Dufner | 416.9 |
Davis Thompson | 400.9 |
Brr, that’s cold
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Downward change |
---|---|
Justin Thomas | -1031.6 |
Taylor Montgomery | -688.4 |
Matt Kuchar | -634.9 |
KH Lee | -623.0 |
Peter Kuest | -593.6 |
Kevin Kisner | -539.9 |
Christiaan Bezuidenhout | -534.0 |
Austin Eckroat | -529.6 |
Certain skills required
Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the Silverado course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.
Stat value | Statistic |
---|---|
Location, location, location
Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Jason Day | 70.15 |
Brian Harman | 70.15 |
Scottie Scheffler | 70.36 |
Hideki Matsuyama | 70.44 |
Byeong Hun An | 70.46 |
Tommy Fleetwood | 70.47 |
Denny McCarthy | 70.54 |
Eric Cole | 70.56 |
Anyplace but here
Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Cameron Young | 71.9 |
Sepp Straka | 71.8 |
Kurt Kitayama | 71.7 |
Sahith Theegala | 71.5 |
Corey Conners | 71.5 |
Keegan Bradley | 71.5 |
Tom Hoge | 71.4 |
Collin Morikawa | 71.4 |
Staying close to home
Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2023 and Napa CA, the event host city.
Player | Residence | Distance |
---|---|---|
Cameron Champ | Sacramento CA | 43 |
Martin Trainer | Palo Alto CA | 50 |
Justin Suh | Los Angeles Ca | 375 |
JJ Spaun | San Dimas CA | 375 |
Sahith Theegala | Chino Hills CA | 400 |
Scott Piercy | Las Vegas NV | 425 |
Harry Hall | Las Vegas NV | 425 |
Charley Hoffman | Las Vegas NV | 425 |
Nick Watney | Las Vegas NV | 425 |
Taylor Montgomery | Las Vegas NV | 425 |
Doug Ghim | Las Vegas NV | 425 |
David Lipsky | Las Vegas NV | 425 |
Mathematically speaking
The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.
Statistic | Correlation to results |
---|---|
Top of the heap | 0.383 |
I love this place | 0.181 |
Ooh, that’s hot | 0.140 |
Location, location, location | 0.053 |