06
May

A look at the Wells Fargo Championship

Thomas Hawley 0 comment

I love this place!

Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .715 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .335 puts a player in the top 10 percent.

Player History
Rory McIlroy 0.721
Max Homa 0.604
Rickie Fowler 0.601
Brian Harman 0.519
Corey Conners 0.503
Keegan Bradley 0.502
Xander Schauffele 0.465
Emiliano Grillo 0.448

Top of the heap

The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.

Player Rank Rating
Xander Schauffele 2 2279.8
Rory McIlroy 3 2190.0
Patrick Cantlay 4 2038.6
Ludvig Aberg 5 1807.3
Viktor Hovland 6 1695.8
Max Homa 8 1615.2
Wyndham Clark 10 1576.0
Tommy Fleetwood 11 1486.0

Sorry, can’t make it

The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.

Player Rank Rating
Scottie Scheffler 1 3066.1
Jon Rahm 7 1668.6
Tyrrell Hatton 9 1604.1
Adam Scott 24 1242.6

Ooh, that’s hot

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Upward change
Ludvig Aberg 1504.9
Chad Ramey 1325.7
Hideki Matsuyama 1284.7
Kevin Tway 1245.6
Akshay Bhatia 1194.5
Adam Schenk 1153.8
Sepp Straka 1024.8
Chris Kirk 808.7

Brr, that’s cold

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Downward change
Viktor Hovland -1204.0
Sam Burns -1076.2
Xander Schauffele -1046.6
Justin Thomas -907.8
Patrick Cantlay -824.0
Cameron Young -809.7
Keegan Bradley -776.6
Sahith Theegala -775.8

Certain skills required

Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the Quail Hollow Club course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.

Stat value Statistic
0.20 Shots gained off the tee
0.17 Shots gained in approach
0.14 Sand saves
0.10 Shots gained around the green

Location, location, location

Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Xander Schauffele 72.90
Si Woo Kim 73.62
Wyndham Clark 73.66
Hideki Matsuyama 74.06
Chris Kirk 74.10
Byeong Hun An 74.10
Tony Finau 74.62
Shane Lowry 74.74

Anyplace but here

Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Taylor Moore 76.0
Keegan Bradley 75.8
Collin Morikawa 75.6
Justin Thomas 75.4
Stephan Jaeger 75.2
Ludvig Aberg 75.1
Billy Horschel 75.1
Austin Eckroat 75.1

Staying close to home

Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2024 and Charlotte NC, the event host city.

Player Residence Distance
Mac Hughes Charlotte, NC 1
Webb Simpson Charlotte, NC 1
Grayson Murray Raleigh, NC 125
Akshay Bhatia Wake Forest, NC 150
Chris Kirk Athens, GA 175
Brendon Todd Watkinsville, GA 175
Peter Malnati Knoxville, TN 175
Wesley Bryan Alpharetta, GA 200

Mathematically speaking

The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.

Statistic Correlation to results
Top of the heap 0.374
I love this place 0.177
Ooh, that’s hot 0.140
Location, location, location 0.050
Share
0 comment
Thomas HawleyCreative art