27
May

A look at the Canadian Open

Thomas Hawley 0 comment

I love this place!

Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .600 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .275 puts a player in the top 10 percent.

Player History
Rory McIlroy 0.818
Shane Lowry 0.690
Nick Taylor 0.656
Adam Hadwin 0.630
Aaron Rai 0.611
Corey Conners 0.549
Doug Ghim 0.535
Matt Kuchar 0.516

Top of the heap

The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.

Player Rank Rating
Rory McIlroy 3 2304.7
Tommy Fleetwood 11 1531.0
Sahith Theegala 16 1413.8
Shane Lowry 20 1299.6
Sam Burns 22 1274.1
Corey Conners 24 1243.7
Adam Scott 25 1240.5
Cameron Young 33 1148.1

Sorry, can’t make it

The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.

Player Rank Rating
Scottie Scheffler 1 3181.3
Xander Schauffele 2 2459.5
Patrick Cantlay 4 1921.9
Viktor Hovland 5 1850.9

Ooh, that’s hot

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Upward change
Shane Lowry 1995.2
Patrick Fishburn 1443.4
Rory McIlroy 1342.9
Ryan Brehm 1258.9
Paul Barjon 1223.8
Taylor Pendrith 1172.8
Alex Noren 1017.3
Kevin Tway 994.1

Brr, that’s cold

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Downward change
Cameron Young -1046.6
Sahith Theegala -897.5
Eric Cole -871.3
Sam Burns -844.8
Nicolai Hojgaard -637.2
Nick Taylor -563.9
Sam Ryder -556.7
Beau Hossler -538.0

Certain skills required

Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the Hamilton Golf & CC course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. The four events on this course since 2003 are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.

Stat value Statistic
0.19 Putts per GIR
0.17 Greens in regulation
0.07 Driving distance
0.03 Sand saves

Location, location, location

Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Patton Kizzire 69.55
Nico Echavarria 69.59
Erik van Rooyen 69.59
Aaron Rai 69.69
Sam Burns 69.70
Sam Ryder 69.72
Justin Lower 69.72
Davis Thompson 69.72

Anyplace but here

Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Raul Pereda 71.4
Ben Taylor 71.0
Kevin Kisner 70.9
Scott Gutschewski 70.9
Brandt Snedeker 70.8
Ryan Palmer 70.7
Ryan Brehm 70.7
Paul Barjon 70.7

Staying close to home

Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2024 and Hamilton, ON, the event host city.

Player Residence Distance
Corey Conners Listowel, Ontario 50
Justin Lower Uniontown, OH 175
Nick Hardy Northbrook, IL 400
Akshay Bhatia Wake Forest, NC 500
Chesson Hadley Raleigh NC 525
Mac Hughes Charlotte, NC 550
Trace Crowe Charlotte, NC 550
Jacob Bridgeman Greenville, SC 600

Mathematically speaking

The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.

Statistic Correlation to results
Top of the heap 0.374
I love this place 0.181
Ooh, that’s hot 0.131
Location, location, location 0.049
Sam Burns
Share
0 comment
Thomas HawleyCreative art