Jun
A look at the Rocket Mortgage Classic
I love this place!
Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .600 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .275 puts a player in the top 10 percent.
Player | History |
---|---|
Troy Merritt | 0.734 |
Chris Kirk | 0.668 |
JJ Spaun | 0.644 |
Rickie Fowler | 0.547 |
Taylor Moore | 0.469 |
Adam Schenk | 0.456 |
Stephan Jaeger | 0.452 |
Taylor Pendrith | 0.442 |
Top of the heap
The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Tom Kim | 26 | 1246.4 |
Min Woo Lee | 34 | 1130.0 |
Cameron Young | 36 | 1110.3 |
Rickie Fowler | 38 | 1071.1 |
Alex Noren | 42 | 1028.1 |
Taylor Moore | 45 | 990.8 |
Cam Davis | 47 | 951.1 |
Will Zalatoris | 48 | 940.4 |
Sorry, can’t make it
The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Scottie Scheffler | 1 | 3220.0 |
Xander Schauffele | 2 | 2549.4 |
Rory McIlroy | 3 | 2437.7 |
Patrick Cantlay | 4 | 2027.0 |
Ooh, that’s hot
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Upward change |
---|---|
Akshay Bhatia | 1232.1 |
Tom Kim | 1053.6 |
Maverick McNealy | 1031.6 |
Lee Hodges | 1025.2 |
Davis Thompson | 993.0 |
Chandler Phillips | 816.9 |
Taylor Pendrith | 727.2 |
Aaron Rai | 612.2 |
Brr, that’s cold
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Downward change |
---|---|
Taylor Moore | -990.8 |
Adam Schenk | -824.4 |
Cam Davis | -770.6 |
Taylor Montgomery | -736.2 |
Chris Kirk | -712.7 |
Eric Cole | -647.2 |
Cameron Young | -633.5 |
Rickie Fowler | -600.0 |
Certain skills required
Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the Detroit GC course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last five years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.
Stat value | Statistic |
---|---|
0.17 | Shots gained off the tee |
0.16 | Shots gained putting |
0.11 | Shots gained in approach |
0.08 | Shots gained around the green |
Location, location, location
Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Keith Mitchell | 69.69 |
Alex Noren | 69.83 |
Stephan Jaeger | 69.90 |
Kevin Yu | 69.94 |
Chris Kirk | 69.95 |
Maverick McNealy | 69.97 |
Doug Ghim | 69.98 |
Akshay Bhatia | 70.00 |
Anyplace but here
Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Raul Pereda | 72.2 |
Camilo Villegas | 72.2 |
Kevin Kisner | 72.2 |
Ben Taylor | 72.1 |
Brandt Snedeker | 71.9 |
Adrien Dumont de Chassart | 71.6 |
Josh Teater | 71.5 |
Scott Gutschewski | 71.5 |
Staying close to home
Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2024 and Detroit, the event host city.
Player | Residence | Distance |
---|---|---|
Justin Lower | Uniontown, OH | 125 |
Nick Hardy | Northbrook, IL | 250 |
Adam Schenk | Vincennes, IN | 350 |
Peter Malnati | Knoxville, TN | 450 |
Alex Smalley | Greensboro, NC | 475 |
Brandt Snedeker | Nashville, TN | 475 |
Akshay Bhatia | Wake Forest, NC | 500 |
Trace Crowe | Charlotte, NC | 500 |
Webb Simpson | Charlotte, NC | 500 |
Mathematically speaking
The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.
Statistic | Correlation to results |
---|---|
Top of the heap | 0.380 |
I love this place | 0.184 |
Ooh, that’s hot | 0.130 |
Location, location, location | 0.046 |