24
Jun

A look at the Rocket Mortgage Classic

Thomas Hawley 0 comment

I love this place!

Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .600 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .275 puts a player in the top 10 percent.

Player History
Troy Merritt 0.734
Chris Kirk 0.668
JJ Spaun 0.644
Rickie Fowler 0.547
Taylor Moore 0.469
Adam Schenk 0.456
Stephan Jaeger 0.452
Taylor Pendrith 0.442

Top of the heap

The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.

Player Rank Rating
Tom Kim 26 1246.4
Min Woo Lee 34 1130.0
Cameron Young 36 1110.3
Rickie Fowler 38 1071.1
Alex Noren 42 1028.1
Taylor Moore 45 990.8
Cam Davis 47 951.1
Will Zalatoris 48 940.4

Sorry, can’t make it

The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.

Player Rank Rating
Scottie Scheffler 1 3220.0
Xander Schauffele 2 2549.4
Rory McIlroy 3 2437.7
Patrick Cantlay 4 2027.0

Ooh, that’s hot

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Upward change
Akshay Bhatia 1232.1
Tom Kim 1053.6
Maverick McNealy 1031.6
Lee Hodges 1025.2
Davis Thompson 993.0
Chandler Phillips 816.9
Taylor Pendrith 727.2
Aaron Rai 612.2

Brr, that’s cold

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Downward change
Taylor Moore -990.8
Adam Schenk -824.4
Cam Davis -770.6
Taylor Montgomery -736.2
Chris Kirk -712.7
Eric Cole -647.2
Cameron Young -633.5
Rickie Fowler -600.0

Certain skills required

Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the Detroit GC course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last five years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.

Stat value Statistic
0.17 Shots gained off the tee
0.16 Shots gained putting
0.11 Shots gained in approach
0.08 Shots gained around the green

Location, location, location

Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Keith Mitchell 69.69
Alex Noren 69.83
Stephan Jaeger 69.90
Kevin Yu 69.94
Chris Kirk 69.95
Maverick McNealy 69.97
Doug Ghim 69.98
Akshay Bhatia 70.00

Anyplace but here

Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Raul Pereda 72.2
Camilo Villegas 72.2
Kevin Kisner 72.2
Ben Taylor 72.1
Brandt Snedeker 71.9
Adrien Dumont de Chassart 71.6
Josh Teater 71.5
Scott Gutschewski 71.5

Staying close to home

Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2024 and Detroit, the event host city.

Player Residence Distance
Justin Lower Uniontown, OH 125
Nick Hardy Northbrook, IL 250
Adam Schenk Vincennes, IN 350
Peter Malnati Knoxville, TN 450
Alex Smalley Greensboro, NC 475
Brandt Snedeker Nashville, TN 475
Akshay Bhatia Wake Forest, NC 500
Trace Crowe Charlotte, NC 500
Webb Simpson Charlotte, NC 500

Mathematically speaking

The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.

Statistic Correlation to results
Top of the heap 0.380
I love this place 0.184
Ooh, that’s hot 0.130
Location, location, location 0.046
Share
0 comment
Thomas HawleyCreative art