22
Jul

A look at the 3M Open

Thomas Hawley 0 comment

I love this place!

Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .590 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .270 puts a player in the top 10 percent.

Player History
Tony Finau 0.840
Emiliano Grillo 0.620
Adam Long 0.584
JT Poston 0.575
Tom Hoge 0.547
Brice Garnett 0.516
Doug Ghim 0.459
Aaron Baddeley 0.453

Top of the heap

The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.

Player Rank Rating
Tony Finau 16 1469.8
Sahith Theegala 19 1406.5
Sam Burns 21 1386.9
Keegan Bradley 33 1139.1
JT Poston 34 1123.2
Cam Davis 39 1050.0
Adam Hadwin 42 1018.5
Justin Rose 43 1015.8

Sorry, can’t make it

The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.

Player Rank Rating
Scottie Scheffler 1 3291.9
Xander Schauffele 2 2643.3
Rory McIlroy 3 2431.3
Patrick Cantlay 4 2021.7

Ooh, that’s hot

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Upward change
Akshay Bhatia 1778.1
Tony Finau 1690.9
Max Greyserman 937.8
Andrew Novak 927.0
Hayden Springer 890.6
Rico Hoey 868.4
Harry Hall 708.0
Ben Silverman 625.1

Brr, that’s cold

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Downward change
Adam Schenk -769.6
Taylor Moore -686.8
JT Poston -650.0
Keegan Bradley -602.1
Andrew Putnam -593.5
KH Lee -543.7
Austin Eckroat -533.1
Adam Hadwin -531.2

Certain skills required

Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the TPC Twin Cities course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last five years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.

Stat value Statistic
0.09 Shots gained around the green
0.07 Greens in regulation
0.03 Sand saves
Driving accuracy

Location, location, location

Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Tony Finau 68.88
Andrew Novak 69.06
Maverick McNealy 69.23
Keith Mitchell 69.24
Thriston Lawrence 69.25
Ben Silverman 69.26
Mac Meissner 69.43
Ryo Hisatsune 69.43

Anyplace but here

Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Paul Barjon 72.5
Ben Taylor 71.8
Brandt Snedeker 71.8
Ryan Brehm 71.6
Callum Tarren 71.4
Gary Woodland 71.3
Adrien Dumont de Chassart 71.2
Erik Barnes 71.2

Staying close to home

Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2024 and Blaine MN, the event host city.

Player Residence Distance
Tom Hoge Fargo, ND 200
Nick Hardy Northbrook, IL 350
Brice Garnett Gallatin MO 375
Adam Schenk Vincennes, IN 525
Sam Stevens Wichita, KS 550
Austin Cook Jonesboro, AR 650
Justin Lower Uniontown, OH 650
Austin Eckroat Edmond, OK 700

Mathematically speaking

The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.

Statistic Correlation to results
Top of the heap 0.378
I love this place 0.183
Ooh, that’s hot 0.130
Location, location, location 0.013
Share
0 comment
Thomas HawleyCreative art