03
Feb

A look at the WM Phoenix Open

Thomas Hawley 0 comment

I love this place!

Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .590 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .270 puts a player in the top 10 percent.

Player History
Justin Thomas 0.861
Scottie Scheffler 0.702
Hideki Matsuyama 0.635
Jordan Spieth 0.554
Billy Horschel 0.531
Charley Hoffman 0.527
Sam Burns 0.488
Keith Mitchell 0.465

Top of the heap

The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.

Player Rank Rating
Scottie Scheffler 1 3014.0
Hideki Matsuyama 10 1547.1
Sam Burns 11 1539.7
Sungjae Im 12 1531.2
Luke Clanton 13 1505.9
Corey Conners 16 1425.4
Justin Thomas 17 1406.4
Wyndham Clark 19 1334.5

Sorry, can’t make it

The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.

Player Rank Rating
Xander Schauffele 2 2477.9
Rory McIlroy 3 2327.3
Collin Morikawa 4 1959.0
Patrick Cantlay 5 1849.0

Ooh, that’s hot

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Upward change
Sepp Straka 1814.6
Harry Hall 1433.5
Nick Taylor 1180.4
Lee Hodges 1039.3
JJ Spaun 1017.5
Tom Hoge 895.9
Rasmus Hojgaard 893.1
Andrew Novak 886.6

Brr, that’s cold

Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.

Player Downward change
Wyndham Clark -1034.4
Brian Harman -794.6
Corey Conners -763.1
Scottie Scheffler -738.4
Sahith Theegala -718.4
Brendon Todd -671.9
Jordan Spieth -663.9
Adam Hadwin -617.6

Certain skills required

Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the TPC Scottsdale course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on this course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.

Stat value Statistic
0.11 Putts per GIR
0.11 Shots gained around the green
0.07 Shots gained putting
0.06 Sand saves

Location, location, location

Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Joel Dahmen 72.09
Aaron Rai 72.11
Daniel Berger 72.12
Doug Ghim 72.14
Henrik Norlander 72.15
Greyson Sigg 72.16
Si Woo Kim 72.16
Adam Svensson 72.17

Anyplace but here

Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.

Course fit Player
Taylor Montgomery 72.7
Mac Hughes 72.6
Chris Gotterup 72.6
SH Kim 72.6
Peter Malnati 72.6
Davis Riley 72.5
Aaron Baddeley 72.5
Pierceson Coody 72.5

Staying close to home

Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2025 and Scottsdale AZ, the event host city.

Player Residence Distance
Kevin Yu Scottsdale, AZ 10
Kevin Streelman Scottsdale, AZ 10
Chez Reavie Scottsdale, AZ 10
Wyndham Clark Scottsdale, AZ 10
Jake Knapp Scottsdale, AZ 10
Joel Dahmen Scottsdale, AZ 10
Max Homa Scottsdale, AZ 10
Nate Lashley Scottsdale, AZ 10

Mathematically speaking

The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.

Statistic Correlation to results
Top of the heap 0.382
I love this place 0.179
Ooh, that’s hot 0.123
Location, location, location 0.011
Wyndham Clark
Share
0 comment
Thomas HawleyCreative art