Feb
A look at the Cognizant Classic in the Palm Beaches
I love this place!
Entrants ranked on history in the event. The value reflects the player’s success and number of years competed within the last eight years, weighted in favor of more recent seasons. A value of 1.000 would mean the player appeared every year and won every time. A value of about .595 puts the player in the top 1 percent of all players who have played the event at least once in the last eight seasons, a value of .270 puts a player in the top 10 percent.
Player | History |
---|---|
Shane Lowry | 0.711 |
Chris Kirk | 0.589 |
Billy Horschel | 0.522 |
Sepp Straka | 0.484 |
Byeong Hun An | 0.482 |
Zach Johnson | 0.462 |
Keith Mitchell | 0.450 |
CT Pan | 0.444 |
Top of the heap
The top eight players (per the Hawley Ratings) among this event’s entries.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Russell Henley | 7 | 1778.0 |
Sungjae Im | 14 | 1431.9 |
Shane Lowry | 16 | 1404.7 |
Denny McCarthy | 17 | 1382.2 |
Luke Clanton | 21 | 1331.7 |
Sepp Straka | 23 | 1290.5 |
Taylor Pendrith | 29 | 1189.5 |
Brian Harman | 32 | 1171.7 |
Sorry, can’t make it
The top four players (per the Hawley Ratings) who are not playing this event.
Player | Rank | Rating |
---|---|---|
Scottie Scheffler | 1 | 3022.6 |
Xander Schauffele | 2 | 2473.7 |
Rory McIlroy | 3 | 2320.7 |
Collin Morikawa | 4 | 2006.9 |
Ooh, that’s hot
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Upward change |
---|---|
Andrew Novak | 1996.0 |
Sepp Straka | 1853.5 |
Daniel Berger | 1637.1 |
Michael Kim | 1523.1 |
Gary Woodland | 1162.2 |
Alex Smalley | 1118.8 |
Denny McCarthy | 978.6 |
Aldrich Potgieter | 874.0 |
Brr, that’s cold
Players are ranked by performance in their last four appearances in comparison with their current Hawley Rating.
Player | Downward change |
---|---|
Byeong Hun An | -854.2 |
Kurt Kitayama | -736.9 |
Emiliano Grillo | -729.9 |
Eric Cole | -706.3 |
Mark Hubbard | -699.4 |
Brendon Todd | -640.3 |
Cameron Young | -635.3 |
Chris Kirk | -593.0 |
Certain skills required
Among a set of 10 PGA Tour and DP World Tour statistics that reflect physical characteristics of the course, this table shows the four that have the highest unique correlation with player performance. Events on the PGA National (Champion) course within the last eight years are considered, and the minimum is 80 player appearances. In mathematical terms, the number shown is the partial correlation coefficient.
Stat value | Statistic |
---|---|
0.17 | Shots gained putting |
0.07 | Putts per GIR |
0.05 | Driving accuracy |
0.04 | Sand saves |
Location, location, location
Event entrants ranked by predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. based on the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Joel Dahmen | 72.09 |
Aaron Rai | 72.11 |
Daniel Berger | 72.12 |
Doug Ghim | 72.14 |
Henrik Norlander | 72.15 |
Greyson Sigg | 72.16 |
Si Woo Kim | 72.16 |
Adam Svensson | 72.17 |
Anyplace but here
Event entrants ranked by worst predicted score per 18 holes based solely on “course fit” — i.e. the player’s current percentile standing in each of the four statistics shown above.
Course fit | Player |
---|---|
Taylor Montgomery | 72.7 |
Mac Hughes | 72.6 |
Chris Gotterup | 72.6 |
SH Kim | 72.6 |
Peter Malnati | 72.6 |
Davis Riley | 72.5 |
Aaron Baddeley | 72.5 |
Pierceson Coody | 72.5 |
Staying close to home
Exempt entrants ranked by miles between their listed residence as of January 2025 and Palm Beach Gardens FL, the event host city.
Player | Residence | Distance |
---|---|---|
Patrick Rodgers | Palm Beach Gardens, FL | 0 |
Adam Svensson | Palm Beach Gardens, FL | 0 |
Taylor Pendrith | Palm Beach Gardens, FL | 0 |
Denny McCarthy | Jupiter, FL | 6 |
Rickie Fowler | Jupiter, FL | 6 |
Shane Lowry | Jupiter, FL | 6 |
Bud Cauley | Jupiter, FL | 6 |
Ryan Gerard | Jupiter, FL | 6 |
Cameron Young | Jupiter, FL | 6 |
Daniel Berger | Jupiter, FL | 6 |
Mathematically speaking
The following table shows the correlations between player ranking in the above tables and their actual finish positions. In other words, to what extent does the ordering of players in the table correspond to the order of finish.
Statistic | Correlation to results |
---|---|
Top of the heap | 0.383 |
I love this place | 0.179 |
Ooh, that’s hot | 0.121 |
Location, location, location | 0.010 |